Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

→‎Vote for re-insertion: debate map definition delivered
(→‎Vote for re-insertion: debate map definition delivered)
Line 533: Line 533:
:Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:Didn't you just do that? I vote, only under agreement that it allows linking to in-depth, well organized, criticism such as Dilley's idea for the Conservapedia page to have a [[Constructive Criticism of Conservapedia]]. But I favor rather a page for real debate maps (better than the ones above). (Note those debate maps suck because, they were not completed, because I found out half way through, my debate opponents did not want to create a debate map.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:17, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::Whatever your idea of a "debate map" means (can I have a link to what you mean?), all I see is you mucking up others' comments where ever you feel like it.  [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:42, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::Whatever your idea of a "debate map" means (can I have a link to what you mean?), all I see is you mucking up others' comments where ever you feel like it.  [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:42, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Wad r u, like a cyberstork or somtin? I wasn't expecting nobody to be reading all this crap. I whipped up a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Debate_map definition of debate map], at [[Lumeniki]]. I ask you the same question, "What is a debate map?" (What should we have it mean?) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:22, 11 September 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits