1,136
edits
(→Vote for re-insertion: debate map definition delivered) |
|||
Line 528: | Line 528: | ||
::I second BobM. There is no consideration given to "nay" votes in the line at the top, btw. Good luck ''finding'' 3 sysops, though. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::I second BobM. There is no consideration given to "nay" votes in the line at the top, btw. Good luck ''finding'' 3 sysops, though. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:41, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::I must admit that I felt that the "three sysops" objective was setting the bar rather high. Possibly we need to propose some more sysops.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 06:55, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | :::I must admit that I felt that the "three sysops" objective was setting the bar rather high. Possibly we need to propose some more sysops.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 06:55, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Move 'what' to article page? The only thing we need the sysops for is to unprotect the article. We still have no [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|policy for notability, verifiablity, or POV (although Dilley doesn't prefer "NPOV")]]. [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Enforcement_against_editors|Edit sparing]] isn't ideal, but if we don't do that, certain editors have assumed the article is non-controversial. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:35, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::Why don't we work on the article while it is here? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:35, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Vote for re-insertion== | ==Vote for re-insertion== |
edits