User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions

m
Line 191: Line 191:
::Many of the bureaucrats have their pages set up this way. You may have more influence over this wiki than they do. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:06, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::Many of the bureaucrats have their pages set up this way. You may have more influence over this wiki than they do. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:06, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::And that is a bad idea, because it makes finding several toolbox links more difficult. Also what influence? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 06:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::And that is a bad idea, because it makes finding several toolbox links more difficult. Also what influence? [[User:Nx|Nx]] 06:13, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::::Yeah I got it, Boss. You want people to know about that toolbox and have easier access to your edits here. I thought that might be less commonly known than how to plug a user name into a search engine. But I don't know your definition of "cyberstalking", so I'm not sure I can promise not to do that. I can understand that you probably wouldn't be able to tell us, [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Legitimate_acquisition_of_biographical_info_about_.22adults.22|like Phantoom Hoover did]], because then we might know how to find the information you don't want us to find. Or maybe you have nothing to hide and it is just more the principle of preventing cyberstalking, that you wish to uphold. Some of your "correct" ways, just don't seem to have any rhyme or reason, to me. Perhaps now you can see why? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:34, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
::::Yeah I got it, Boss. You want people to know about that toolbox and have easier access to your edits here. I thought that might be less commonly known than how to plug a user name into a search engine. But I don't know your definition of "cyberstalking", so I'm not sure I can promise not to do that. I can understand that you probably wouldn't be able to tell us, [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Legitimate_acquisition_of_biographical_info_about_.22adults.22|like Phantom Hoover did]], because then we might know how to find the information you don't want us to find. Or maybe you have nothing to hide and it is just more the principle of preventing cyberstalking, that you wish to uphold. Some of your "correct" ways, just don't seem to have any rhyme or reason, to me. Perhaps now you can see why? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:34, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
::::Note first off that it wouldn't take much to have more of an influence than most of the bureaucrats. So perhaps I'm guilty of a little more snarkiness on that point. (Maybe this is incorrect, if they have helped develop Dilley's ideas, or if they are still somewhat active, behind the scenes.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
::::Note first off that it wouldn't take much to have more of an influence than most of the bureaucrats. So perhaps I'm guilty of a little more snarkiness on that point. (Maybe this is incorrect, if they have helped develop Dilley's ideas, or if they are still somewhat active, behind the scenes.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::We've spent a great deal of time "debating" and "edit sparring". So, for example, if you say I am a "concern troll", your associates may be inclined to believe you. I think this could influence policies that are eventually developed here. With your activity level and your experience, you may help write unwritten "policies" or "conventions", just as you intend to. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::We've spent a great deal of time "debating" and "edit sparring". So, for example, if you say I am a "concern troll", your associates may be inclined to believe you. I think this could influence policies that are eventually developed here. With your activity level and your experience, you may help write unwritten "policies" or "conventions", just as you intend to. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:51, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits