Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

→‎Criticism: quoted 1st source, added criticism "Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does."[2]
(→‎Put a comparisons of wikis section in the RationalWiki article: deleting comments that must have been mistakenly placed there, see timestamps)
(→‎Criticism: quoted 1st source, added criticism "Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does."[2])
Line 34: Line 34:


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
Despite its claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its editors are hostile towards religion.
"[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]
:There was a source for this statement, it was deleted. This statement was written by the founder of [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]], a "conservative" offshoot of [[Conservapedia]]. Expect this to be deleted as well. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:07, 10 September 2009 (EDT)


[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|Does Wikipedia achieve the goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does?]] [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:03, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
"Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does."[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]]


==(About other wikis)==
==(About other wikis)==
1,136

edits