5,637
edits
Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge: Difference between revisions
→Vote for re-insertion: OK to unprotect
(→Vote for re-insertion: aye) |
(→Vote for re-insertion: OK to unprotect) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: Felix - great point - direct reverting and re-reverting of edits in an edit war situation are useless in a wiki and should be avoided. Maybe we need to make that a 'policy'. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | : Felix - great point - direct reverting and re-reverting of edits in an edit war situation are useless in a wiki and should be avoided. Maybe we need to make that a 'policy'. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
-- [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 12:16, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | -- [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 12:16, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
-- '''Unprotect'''. I'm OK with the page being unprotected. I think the draft above still needs some work, though. Specifically, the phrase "most of the membership consists of RationalWikians who do not agree with the site's worldview" is problematic. Unless you have access to the IP logs of both sites, or for that matter, psychic insight into the contributors' minds, I think you should shy away from making such general statements which cannot be backed up with a reference. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:02, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | |||