|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| __TOC__ | | __TOC__ |
|
| |
| '''RationalWiki''' is an open wiki taking a critical look at the pseudoscience movement and extremist politics, through the use of side-by-side examinations and humour.
| |
|
| |
| Stated goals are:
| |
| * Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people.
| |
| * Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas.
| |
| * Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
| |
|
| |
| RationalWiki has about 3,197 registered accounts, of which 359 (or 11.23%) have [[Sysop]]s rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s.
| |
|
| |
| RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as; up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy bible quotations.
| |
|
| |
| RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]].
| |
|
| |
| ==History==
| |
| RationalWiki started in {{tag|FoundedIn2007|May 2007}} after a group of editors at [[Conservapedia]] were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political bias. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at [[Conservapedia]].
| |
|
| |
| ==RationalWiki today==
| |
| While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major focus of RationalWiki, they have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, some editors are practicing Christians or Jews, tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism.
| |
|
| |
| The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, Creationism, {{tag|Astrology}}, "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis notably [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]], see [[RationalWiki:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge| RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]].
| |
|
| |
| Despite this branching into other areas, most of their traffic is to the page [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F RationalWiki: What is going on at Conservapedia?].
| |
|
| |
| The website has a rather idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group.
| |
|
| |
| Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:-
| |
| <Blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article]''</Blockquote>
| |
|
| |
| ==Criticism==
| |
| "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]
| |
|
| |
| "Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does."[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]]
| |
|
| |
| ==(About other wikis)==
| |
|
| |
| I propose that anyone may take wikis from the following categories and bring them out into "see also" or "similar wikis", if they have descriptions comparing them with RationalWiki. Some of these descriptions may be available somewhere in the edit history, as they were deleted, much like the source for the above critical quote. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:57, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==See also==
| |
|
| |
| *[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki.
| |
| *[[:Category:Atheism]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Pseudoscience]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Creationism]]
| |
|
| |
| *[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:34, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Similar wikis==
| |
|
| |
| *[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics -- but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page - RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles, therefore this wiki should be listed here.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Talk page== | | ==Talk page== |
| Line 567: |
Line 514: |
|
| |
|
| [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 07:53, 14 September 2009 (EDT) | | [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 07:53, 14 September 2009 (EDT) |
| | |
| | I've just (tentatively) restored and unprotected the article. Let's see if this helps. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 01:14, 17 September 2009 (EDT) |