1,136
edits
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
→Criticism: I don't know how those stats got replaced. I apologize if that was my fault and no one is hacking the WikiIndex server, for example. Added my signature and clarified quote.
(→Criticism: perhaps this should have an attribution) |
(→Criticism: I don't know how those stats got replaced. I apologize if that was my fault and no one is hacking the WikiIndex server, for example. Added my signature and clarified quote.) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | ||
"It seems to me that Wikipedia probably achieves the stated goals RationalWiki, to a far greater extent than RationalWiki does. All rebuttals have been countered and one prolific RationalWikian bureaucrat, appears to have conceded. However most of my arguments were not addressed at all. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:18, 20 September 2009 (EDT) " | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||