173
edits
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) (→Criticism: removing ridiculous assertions) |
(→Criticism: rm more ridiculous assertions) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | ||
"It seems to me that Wikipedia probably achieves the stated goals RationalWiki, to a far greater extent than RationalWiki does | "It seems to me that Wikipedia probably achieves the stated goals RationalWiki, to a far greater extent than RationalWiki does. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:18, 20 September 2009 (EDT) " | ||
==See also== | ==See also== |
edits