146
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 23:35, 21 September 2009
, 21 September 2009→No, Wikipedia cannot, does not, and never will
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
:::::I've explained what NPOV means in the Wikipedia. This is one of many points y'all failed to address. You don't debate or make your case. You just delete what you don't want to hear. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&curid=13789&diff=71784&oldid=71778] [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=71778&oldid=71774] You are altering a quote, BTW. And this is against [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|WikiIndex policy]]. Phantom Hoover and Huw Powel (Human), are both [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bureaucrat&limit=50 bureaucrats at RationalWiki]. Are these your usual methods of thought control there? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:30, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::I've explained what NPOV means in the Wikipedia. This is one of many points y'all failed to address. You don't debate or make your case. You just delete what you don't want to hear. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&curid=13789&diff=71784&oldid=71778] [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=71778&oldid=71774] You are altering a quote, BTW. And this is against [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|WikiIndex policy]]. Phantom Hoover and Huw Powel (Human), are both [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=&group=bureaucrat&limit=50 bureaucrats at RationalWiki]. Are these your usual methods of thought control there? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:30, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Wikipedia has an article called, ''[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Evolution_as_theory_and_fact Evolution as theory and fact]''. Does this violate NPOV? Here is the NPOV policy again, [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources "In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers."] Notice the terms, "respectable" and "mainstream". In case you aren't familiar with the Wikipedia, the "respectable mainstream" usually means the majority of the "scientific" community. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:19, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::Wikipedia has an article called, ''[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Evolution_as_theory_and_fact Evolution as theory and fact]''. Does this violate NPOV? Here is the NPOV policy again, [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources "In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers."] Notice the terms, "respectable" and "mainstream". In case you aren't familiar with the Wikipedia, the "respectable mainstream" usually means the majority of the "scientific" community. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:19, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
I notice you totally ignored the other two articles I linked to above. Also, those diffs where PH & I edited the article to remove unsubstantiated claims were not "editing a quote", they were removing what you wrote and put quote marks around. I also see you are still citing "policy" by linking to a page you created and continue to keep making a mess of. | |||
Please address whether wikipedia can do what we did with the Expelled leaders' guide and the Behe "interview". [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:35, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Put a comparisons of wikis section in the RationalWiki article == | == Put a comparisons of wikis section in the RationalWiki article == | ||