1,136
edits
Talk:Biohack: Difference between revisions
→Site is down presently
(Reply) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::My personal rule of thumb is not to mark a site as inactive until a month or two has passed. It could just be a really bad server crash or a relaunch on a new server. But I don't think we've set any hard and fast rules. | :::My personal rule of thumb is not to mark a site as inactive until a month or two has passed. It could just be a really bad server crash or a relaunch on a new server. But I don't think we've set any hard and fast rules. | ||
:::As for the category spamming, it does seem excessive, but if you look at the categories, it's not just a completely random collection of words. The categories are related. Also, if spamming was the intention, I would assume that they'd target already existing categories; over one third are non-existent. That said, I don't see any problem with paring it down if you see fit to do so. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:59, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | :::As for the category spamming, it does seem excessive, but if you look at the categories, it's not just a completely random collection of words. The categories are related. Also, if spamming was the intention, I would assume that they'd target already existing categories; over one third are non-existent. That said, I don't see any problem with paring it down if you see fit to do so. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:59, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::The only problem I would see with putting Wikipedia in most categories is that it wouldn't help the vast majority of readers because they already know about it. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 21:01, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | |||