Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
Talk:Biohack: Difference between revisions
using Template:Tag seems to answer the question of many categories
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (using Template:Tag seems to answer the question of many categories) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::As for the category spamming, it does seem excessive, but if you look at the categories, it's not just a completely random collection of words. The categories are related. Also, if spamming was the intention, I would assume that they'd target already existing categories; over one third are non-existent. That said, I don't see any problem with paring it down if you see fit to do so. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:59, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | :::As for the category spamming, it does seem excessive, but if you look at the categories, it's not just a completely random collection of words. The categories are related. Also, if spamming was the intention, I would assume that they'd target already existing categories; over one third are non-existent. That said, I don't see any problem with paring it down if you see fit to do so. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:59, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::The only problem I would see with putting Wikipedia in most categories is that it wouldn't help the vast majority of readers because they already know about it. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 21:01, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | :::The only problem I would see with putting Wikipedia in most categories is that it wouldn't help the vast majority of readers because they already know about it. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 21:01, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
: ''I like using the [[Template:Tag]] - that way you can add categories to the content part of the page. ~~ [[MarkDilley]]'' | |||