Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Line 298: Line 298:


Please address whether wikipedia can do what we did with the Expelled leaders' guide and the Behe "interview". [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:35, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
Please address whether wikipedia can do what we did with the Expelled leaders' guide and the Behe "interview". [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 19:35, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
:Actually Felix said his edit of the policy page was only a proposal. But it is on the official etiquette page, that we are not to be deleting things. I don't really think that is a great rule however. I had hopes that we could find some criteria to resolve disputes without arbitration or capitulation. But I can't think of any way to do this objectively. Tired, Yoda is. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:02, 23 September 2009 (EDT)
:Of course I need to address all of your points while you ignore most of mine. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:02, 23 September 2009 (EDT)
:About those book reviews. I started reading the one about Behe, came to the first "source" which is another long and disorganized diatribe, this time by only one person. Have you read these RationalWiki articles? On the topics covered by these books, are there any major arguments that aren't addressed in the Wikipedia? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:02, 23 September 2009 (EDT)
:This seems kinda like trying to prove that a commercial that is on during the Super Bowl, is going to have more of an influence than a commercial during a rerun of Mash. I can't exactly ''prove'' it with absolute certainty. Some Wikipedia pages may be less noticed than some RationalWiki pages, especially if RationalWiki features the page. In general, it would seem that editing the Wikipedia pages on the major topics, is more likely to have an influence. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 23:02, 23 September 2009 (EDT)


== Put a comparisons of wikis section in the RationalWiki article ==
== Put a comparisons of wikis section in the RationalWiki article ==
1,136

edits