1,136
edits
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
The last edit I changed what Hoovie calls "Criticism and rebuttals" to "Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats". Adding "Debated criticism" section with link to debate on talk page.
(The last edit I changed what Hoovie calls "Criticism and rebuttals" to "Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats". Adding "Debated criticism" section with link to debate on talk page.) |
|||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats== | ==Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats== | ||
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | ||
==Debated criticism== | |||
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|A debate on the question of whether edits of the Wikipedia are more likely to refute pseudoscience and crank ideas.]] | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||