1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 16:16, 25 September 2009
, 25 September 2009→Time to end this war: What am I supposed to do?
(→Time to end this war: What am I supposed to do?) |
|||
| Line 570: | Line 570: | ||
:As I see it, there are two separate conflicts. I have rewritten the criticism a number of times. It seems it is improving, but this process is slow and it ''creates the other conflict with you''. The solution would be, as you suggest, to do this somewhere else, but I think they would be quite happy with no criticism and they don't know yet whether they should have to do any of this work, or if you will let them delete it, as they presently have. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 20:32, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | :As I see it, there are two separate conflicts. I have rewritten the criticism a number of times. It seems it is improving, but this process is slow and it ''creates the other conflict with you''. The solution would be, as you suggest, to do this somewhere else, but I think they would be quite happy with no criticism and they don't know yet whether they should have to do any of this work, or if you will let them delete it, as they presently have. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 20:32, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Heh. You just said it yourself: "they would be quite happy with no criticism and they don't know yet whether they should have to do any of this work". Can you guess why? Because they ''should not'' have to. Why is it so important that you present criticism of RationalWiki here? Or anywhere else for that matter? And if it is, why not use a blog, over which you would have full control. Think about it, if people are SO bothered by your criticism, maybe they have a point. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 01:47, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Heh. You just said it yourself: "they would be quite happy with no criticism and they don't know yet whether they should have to do any of this work". Can you guess why? Because they ''should not'' have to. Why is it so important that you present criticism of RationalWiki here? Or anywhere else for that matter? And if it is, why not use a blog, over which you would have full control. Think about it, if people are SO bothered by your criticism, maybe they have a point. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 01:47, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::[[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Criticism_of_wikis|Some other administrators seemed to support the idea of having criticism]], and there is an [[WikiIndex:Editing etiquette|etiquette policy forbidding deleting the work of others]] (which [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex%3APolicies_and_Guidelines&diff=71695&oldid=71524 you seemed to support]). But now it seems that deleting the criticism is really preferred to making the case that it is a valid criticism. Simply the fact that they have deleted it, gives you reason to believe that "they have a point" whereas my debating anything only seems to make you mad. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::[[User_talk:Lumenos#Please don't give in to provocations|You posted on my talk page that "a certain other WikiIndex user seems to be hunting down your edits"]]. It seems I have made another mistake of trying to rewrite these edits in order to reach consensus with those deleting them. Was I supposed to request page protection or what? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | |||