616
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 06:13, 27 September 2009
, 27 September 2009→Time to end this war
(→Time to end this war: What am I supposed to do?) |
|||
| Line 572: | Line 572: | ||
:::[[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Criticism_of_wikis|Some other administrators seemed to support the idea of having criticism]], and there is an [[WikiIndex:Editing etiquette|etiquette policy forbidding deleting the work of others]] (which [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex%3APolicies_and_Guidelines&diff=71695&oldid=71524 you seemed to support]). But now it seems that deleting the criticism is really preferred to making the case that it is a valid criticism. Simply the fact that they have deleted it, gives you reason to believe that "they have a point" whereas my debating anything only seems to make you mad. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | :::[[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Criticism_of_wikis|Some other administrators seemed to support the idea of having criticism]], and there is an [[WikiIndex:Editing etiquette|etiquette policy forbidding deleting the work of others]] (which [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex%3APolicies_and_Guidelines&diff=71695&oldid=71524 you seemed to support]). But now it seems that deleting the criticism is really preferred to making the case that it is a valid criticism. Simply the fact that they have deleted it, gives you reason to believe that "they have a point" whereas my debating anything only seems to make you mad. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::[[User_talk:Lumenos#Please don't give in to provocations|You posted on my talk page that "a certain other WikiIndex user seems to be hunting down your edits"]]. It seems I have made another mistake of trying to rewrite these edits in order to reach consensus with those deleting them. Was I supposed to request page protection or what? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | :::[[User_talk:Lumenos#Please don't give in to provocations|You posted on my talk page that "a certain other WikiIndex user seems to be hunting down your edits"]]. It seems I have made another mistake of trying to rewrite these edits in order to reach consensus with those deleting them. Was I supposed to request page protection or what? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::: You're either playing stupid, or else you really don't get it, so let me make you a drawing. It's not that you posted criticism, or that your criticism was deleted. It's that you kept posting it right back many times, against the obvious wishes of a peer (and an admin... I keep forgetting about Proxima Centauri), and then you made a huge scandal when your excessive edits led to the page being locked. We tried to mediate between you and them, but you obviously don't want to negotiate. You don't want a compromise. What are we supposed to do? Make it your way, just because? Sorry, no. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 02:13, 27 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::: You've asked elsewhere about my plans. Honestly, I'm one step away from locking the RationalWiki article for a looong time and stripping it down to the boilerplate. I'll even link to your criticism if you care to post it elsewhere, but you ''have'' to understand that your actions here are making other people uncomfortable and ''stop''. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 02:13, 27 September 2009 (EDT) | |||