1,136
edits
(→Debated criticism: Fixed link.) |
(Labeled debated criticism and put in criticism section. Removed hidden comments and category links from "Similar wikis" section.) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | ||
'''Debated criticism:''' A debate as to whether edits of the [[Wikipedia]] are more likely to refute pseudoscience and crank ideas.[[Talk:RationalWiki/Archive2#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]] | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 59: | Line 57: | ||
==Similar wikis== | ==Similar wikis== | ||
*[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics -- but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page - RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles. | *[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics -- but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page - RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles. | ||
[[Category:Atheism]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]][[Category:Criticism]] | [[Category:Atheism]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]][[Category:Criticism]] |
edits