1,136
edits
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
There is not currently an inclusion policy at WikiIndex; there is only an etiquette policy suggesting we not delete the work of others.
(→Criticism: Debate is over, no consensus reached.) |
(There is not currently an inclusion policy at WikiIndex; there is only an etiquette policy suggesting we not delete the work of others.) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
''The inclusion of controversial content is currently being discussed [[WikiIndex_talk:Policies_and_Guidelines|here]].'' | |||
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]. | ||
'''Debated criticism:''' A debate as to whether edits of the [[Wikipedia]] are more likely to refute pseudoscience and crank ideas.[[Talk:RationalWiki/Archive2#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]] | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||