RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

314 bytes removed ,  15 October 2009
No-one else wants it in.
(There is not currently an inclusion policy at WikiIndex; there is only an etiquette policy suggesting we not delete the work of others.)
(No-one else wants it in.)
Line 46: Line 46:


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
''The inclusion of controversial content is currently being discussed [[WikiIndex_talk:Policies_and_Guidelines|here]].''
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127].
Ex [[Conservapedia]] sysop, Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127].
'''Debated criticism:''' A debate as to whether edits of the [[Wikipedia]] are more likely to refute pseudoscience and crank ideas.[[Talk:RationalWiki/Archive2#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]]


==See also==
==See also==