1,136
edits
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
: I think that most information -- even extremely notable information -- does not belong on WikiIndex itself. I want WikiIndex to help me quickly find the wiki where any particular kind of information does belong. | : I think that most information -- even extremely notable information -- does not belong on WikiIndex itself. I want WikiIndex to help me quickly find the wiki where any particular kind of information does belong. | ||
: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:32, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | : --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:32, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
::For people to rapidly find the best wiki to read, edit, or create, I think comparisons and evaluations can be as important as the noncontroversial information. Many editors invest a lot of time in a wiki only to loose it all when the wiki dies. Or they find the community or management, overbearing, and wish they had contributed to a different place instead. If the license allows it, the content could be | ::For people to rapidly find the best wiki to read, edit, or create, I think comparisons and evaluations can be as important as the noncontroversial information. Many editors invest a lot of time in a wiki only to loose it all when the wiki dies. Or they find the community or management, overbearing, and wish they had contributed to a different place instead. If the license allows it, the content could be copied to another wiki, but this may be a lot of work and Google may penalize sites with duplicate content. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:41, 22 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Things to learn from the RationalWiki policies == | == Things to learn from the RationalWiki policies == | ||
edits