1,136
edits
User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies: Difference between revisions
User:Lumenos/WikiIndex (unwritten) policies (edit)
Revision as of 02:45, 23 June 2010
, 23 June 2010→Content inclusion rules: aside from the strikeout I still agree with this comment
(→Content inclusion rules: I think my comment was assuming that Felix wrote "This first" not "The first". I appologize assuming that was not the case.) |
(→Content inclusion rules: aside from the strikeout I still agree with this comment) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
The first was proposed on IRC by [[User:Lumenos]]; I think it is likely to cause trouble, hence my counter-proposal. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 03:35, 4 October 2009 (EDT) | The first was proposed on IRC by [[User:Lumenos]]; I think it is likely to cause trouble, hence my counter-proposal. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 03:35, 4 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:[To be more accurate,] I was proposing that you have a speedy delete policy that is connected to the block policy for things like biographical information that is obtained in an illegitimate (illegal) manner. Same with things like spam and copyrighted work. Beyond those basic ("common sense") rules, you might not need to forbid things like "criticism", "original research", "unverified claims", etc, if these aren't contested. '''This is to address those who prefer NOT having "rules" that are "strict", "explicit", etc.''' I'm suggesting you need only get out the rule book when people aren't being "nice". But if you want a smoother ride, it might be easier to have a policy that wiki articles are to be always from a sympathetic viewpoint, for example. It is difficult to say if that would be less controversial than an "neutral point of view". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:02, 5 October 2009 (EDT) [Corrected by/on [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:45, 22 June 2010 (EDT)] | |||
==Criticism of wikis== | ==Criticism of wikis== | ||