User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions

→‎Spam bots: response
(→‎Spam bots: Not a bot, after all)
(→‎Spam bots: response)
Line 141: Line 141:


Upon further research, the recent spam probably wasn't done by a bot. The edits weren't that quick. Also, it adapted to making a mistake—putting the spam inside of a comment field. Still, some kind of multiple rollback tool would be nice. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:50, 16 December 2010 (PST)
Upon further research, the recent spam probably wasn't done by a bot. The edits weren't that quick. Also, it adapted to making a mistake—putting the spam inside of a comment field. Still, some kind of multiple rollback tool would be nice. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:50, 16 December 2010 (PST)
: ''I will ask person upgrading the site if there is a mass rollback on a unleashed spammer. Thanks for catching it, please don't hesitate to grab me on [[IRC]] or email to help.  My best, [[MarkDilley]]''
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,133

edits