796
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam. Ray King raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero. We both loathe this option... but... we wanted to) |
m (Spam, spam, spammaty, spam) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
; January 2012: | ; January 2012: | ||
Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam. [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero. We both loathe this option... but... we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam. [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero. We both loathe this option... but... we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
::It's nowhere as bad as it once was, so for the moment, I don't think it's necessary. The anon edits were the real pain and they are mostly gone now, so I think that going to a account authorization system would place more of a load on the Admin I think at least. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] | |||
SOPA fighting. What do folks think about adding WikiIndex to this: http://SopaStrike.com - I would like to if [[Talk:Community Portal/News#SOPA strike|there is general consensus]]. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | SOPA fighting. What do folks think about adding WikiIndex to this: http://SopaStrike.com - I would like to if [[Talk:Community Portal/News#SOPA strike|there is general consensus]]. Best, [[MarkDilley]] |