Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge: Revision history

17 March 2023

• curprev 13:2013:20, 17 March 2023‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ 11,507 bytes +8‎ Fix redirect undo

30 September 2022

• curprev 01:3001:30, 30 September 2022‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ m 11,499 bytes +1‎ Text replacement - "{{TOCright}}" to "{{TOC right}}" undo

8 July 2021

• curprev 11:2911:29, 8 July 2021‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ m 11,498 bytes +151‎ Wikilinks undo

6 March 2018

• curprev 23:4623:46, 6 March 2018‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ m 11,347 bytes −20‎ fix duplicated sub-heading undo

27 February 2014

• curprev 14:5714:57, 27 February 2014‎ Philip J. Rayment talk contribs‎ 11,367 bytes +3,788‎ →‎My edit: Enlarging on why the comment is bigoted nonsense. undo

20 December 2013

• curprev 20:4320:43, 20 December 2013‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ 7,579 bytes +1,518‎ →‎My edit: replied to Philip undo

12 August 2013

• curprev 10:4510:45, 12 August 2013‎ Philip J. Rayment talk contribs‎ 6,061 bytes +1,988‎ No edit summary undo

13 March 2013

• curprev 11:2011:20, 13 March 2013‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ m 4,073 bytes +56‎ →‎sortable list of articles: <!--keep this section at the BOTTOM of this talk page--> undo

26 November 2012

• curprev 00:1800:18, 26 November 2012‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ 4,017 bytes +9‎ {{TOCright}} undo
• curprev 00:1500:15, 26 November 2012‎ Hoof Hearted talk contribs‎ 4,008 bytes −11,285‎ →‎sortable list of articles: exported text to new Template:Table of articles, re-imported via {{table of articles}} undo

21 January 2011

• curprev 21:0521:05, 21 January 2011‎ 206.130.173.53 talk‎ 15,293 bytes +11,340‎ put a good sized sortable list in a number of talk pages undo

5 October 2009

• curprev 11:5811:58, 5 October 2009‎ Phantom Hoover talk contribs‎ 3,953 bytes +119‎ →‎ref tags and "references" tag undo
• curprev 00:3100:31, 5 October 2009‎ Huw Powell talk contribs‎ 3,834 bytes +207‎ →‎ref tags and "references" tag undo
• curprev 00:3000:30, 5 October 2009‎ Huw Powell talk contribs‎ 3,627 bytes +534‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion undo

4 October 2009

• curprev 09:3109:31, 4 October 2009‎ Phantom Hoover talk contribs‎ 3,093 bytes +133‎ →‎ref tags and "references" tag undo
• curprev 08:3308:33, 4 October 2009‎ Huw Powell talk contribs‎ 2,960 bytes +306‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:0907:09, 4 October 2009‎ Lumenos talk contribs‎ 2,654 bytes −1,381‎ deleted article content and heading, that was moved back to the article undo

14 September 2009

• curprev 19:0219:02, 14 September 2009‎ MarvelZuvembie talk contribs‎ 4,035 bytes +553‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion: OK to unprotect undo
• curprev 16:1616:16, 14 September 2009‎ Rpeh talk contribs‎ 3,482 bytes +53‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion: aye undo
• curprev 05:5205:52, 14 September 2009‎ MarkDilley talk contribs‎ 3,429 bytes +200‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion: Comment undo
• curprev 05:4805:48, 14 September 2009‎ Felix talk contribs‎ 3,229 bytes +449‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion undo

13 September 2009

• curprev 18:5818:58, 13 September 2009‎ Lumenos talk contribs‎ 2,780 bytes +144‎ →‎Vote for re-insertion undo

10 September 2009

• curprev 12:1712:17, 10 September 2009‎ Bob M talk contribs‎ 2,636 bytes +314‎ No edit summary undo

8 September 2009

• curprev 17:0617:06, 8 September 2009‎ Lumenos talk contribs‎ 2,322 bytes +125‎ added link to "the conflict" or "the warning" rather undo
• curprev 07:4007:40, 8 September 2009‎ MarkDilley talk contribs‎ 2,197 bytes +84‎ My suggestion: Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict and clear up confusing line, hopefully undo

6 September 2009

• curprev 11:3111:31, 6 September 2009‎ Nx talk contribs‎ 2,113 bytes +30‎ section name, line is confusing undo
• curprev 09:2909:29, 6 September 2009‎ MarkDilley talk contribs‎ 2,083 bytes +1,178‎ Move to article page when agreed upon undo

26 August 2009

• curprev 19:4319:43, 26 August 2009‎ Nx talk contribs‎ 905 bytes +316‎ agree undo

29 June 2009

• curprev 23:2123:21, 29 June 2009‎ Huw Powell talk contribs‎ 589 bytes +589‎ New page: "It appears there was quite a bit of money spent to get the wiki well designed and someone thought of a really good name for it. ASK can't compete with the lavish design that the Schlafly ...