6,456
edits
(→main: cleaning up by removing conversation) |
(→Examples of issues discussed: meta or general?) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Examples of issues discussed== | ==Examples of issues discussed== | ||
* I believe [[TedErnst]] was trying to help me understand that [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] belonged somewhere else, perhaps [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]. Is this what you were thinking Ted? Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | * I believe [[TedErnst]] was trying to help me understand that [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] belonged somewhere else, perhaps [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]]. Is this what you were thinking Ted? Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | ||
** I see articles about wiki in general, like the spam measures example above, as perfectly legitimate in the main namespace. As [[RecursiveNatureOfWiki]] stands right now, it seems like a meta conversation that would be better placed at [[WikiIndex: RecursiveNatureOfWiki]. Now I'm not sure I grok the concept so I might be missing it and maybe it really isn't meta issue for this wiki, but a larger issue of the WikiSphere, in which case it seems to me it should stay where it is. Is my way of thinking about these things helpful to anyone? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 13:50, 21 Jan 2006 (EST) |
edits