Talk:Singularity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edit of 200.118.2.218, changed back to last version by Robin Patterson) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (fix redirect, wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would like to see this page redirected to '''Category:Singularity'''. I think that having a single page that was the category (which is a natural disabmiguous page) and simplifies the idea of self-organization. What do folks think? -- [[MarkDilley]] | I would like to see this page redirected to '''[[:Category:Singularity]]'''. I think that having a single page that was the category (which is a natural disabmiguous page) and simplifies the idea of self-organization. What do folks think? -- [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: A category could contain lots of wikis about a similar subject, all with distinctly different names, one or more of which could be the same as the category, but this is a distinct idea from disambiguation. Disambiguation is discussed at [[ | : A [[Special:Categories|category]] could contain lots of wikis about a similar subject, all with distinctly different names, one or more of which could be the same as the category, but this is a distinct idea from disambiguation. Disambiguation is discussed at [[WikiIndex:Disambiguation]]. Perhaps we can talk more there, on the talk page? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:29, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
:I'm with Ted again (sorry, Mark, nothing personal, it's just MediaWiki experience!!). Unless an article is always going to be very short, it should be on a separate page from the category of the same name, or there will be too much scrolling needed to get to the lists of subcategories and articles, which are the main value of displaying a category. [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 16:26, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | :I'm with Ted again (sorry, Mark, nothing personal, it's just [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] experience!!). Unless an article is always going to be very short, it should be on a separate page from the category of the same name, or there will be too much scrolling needed to get to the lists of subcategories and articles, which are the main value of displaying a category. [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 16:26, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 12 September 2012
I would like to see this page redirected to Category:Singularity. I think that having a single page that was the category (which is a natural disabmiguous page) and simplifies the idea of self-organization. What do folks think? -- MarkDilley
- A category could contain lots of wikis about a similar subject, all with distinctly different names, one or more of which could be the same as the category, but this is a distinct idea from disambiguation. Disambiguation is discussed at WikiIndex:Disambiguation. Perhaps we can talk more there, on the talk page? TedErnst | talk 14:29, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT)
- I'm with Ted again (sorry, Mark, nothing personal, it's just MediaWiki experience!!). Unless an article is always going to be very short, it should be on a separate page from the category of the same name, or there will be too much scrolling needed to get to the lists of subcategories and articles, which are the main value of displaying a category. robinp 16:26, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT)