Category talk:Parked: Difference between revisions
(category can be deleted now) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: Taken care of. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST) | : Taken care of. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
Awesome :-) -[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 13:59, 17 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 17 February 2006
Currently reviewing XpsdWiki, just discovered this category. Could you explain more what you mean ? Should we move ot inactive template ? Christophe Ducamp | talk 03:25, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
- Makes sense to me, but maybe Ray can weigh in, I think this was his idea? MarkDilley | talk
Parked means that the domain now points to a "parking page" which is a way for the registrant or registrar to earn revenue if people click on advertisements on the parked page. In our case this would happen when the wiki is decommissioned and inactive. I don't recall categorizing pages to "parked", but the categorization seems accurate. --Raymond King | talk 03:48, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
I think the template should be inactive, and in the description, we say it is parked, there will still be a link to the site for anyone to click through, but it seems like noise to me. MarkDilley | talk
Yeah, I agree with that and think that will happen automatically. As I look at these I see that they are simply on the inactive list and I haven't gotten to them yet. I'll take care of it. --Raymond King | talk 04:25, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
Awesome :-) -Raymond King | talk 13:59, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)