6,456
edits
Category talk:Community: Difference between revisions
why not meta
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (please change it if you have a better idea :- OR make a version :-) |
(why not meta) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please change it to something more appropriate. [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | Please change it to something more appropriate. [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | ||
The existing category community has 3 articles in it. Two are wikis. I suggest we change the existing description to allow for this use. It's a topic for wikis. | |||
'''And''' I suggest we create a new category WikiIndex for all the meta pages like StartUp, FAQ, Namespace Conventions, etc, etc. thoughts? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:02, 24 Jan 2006 (EST) | |||
== why not meta == | |||
Ted, why is community not a meta topic as well as a wiki category? [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | |||
: Because then when looking at the page, there would be no way to tell which entries are wikis in the community category and which are meta pages. If we want a meta category, let's call is WikiIndex or even Meta. In my opinion, Community is a poor choice because it's ambiguous, and because it's not intuitive. Only two of the pages here were actually meta pages that I needed to move. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 03:12, 8 Mar 2006 (EST) | |||