User:Moon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (removed external broken links, but kept page...) |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Description=== | |||
'Wiki' .. an online open source , editable community. This page , from the moon. | |||
Add a message or your own content , click 'edit' and type it in (THIS PAGE ONLY) , do it at the bottom , please , these 'instructions' will then remain in view for future new visitors. | |||
===Why ?=== | |||
I am interested in feedback on the songs and video , sure .. but the interesting experiment here is in how nervous people feel clicking a star (as opposed to a 'play' button ; when did a green triangle for 'go' become the convention ?) | |||
Of course a lot of people may say ' I won't do it ' .. and i do realise that our home flash recordings are slow to load and ideas only , they're not exactly 'gold' at the end of the figurative rainbow .. maybe not enough of a carrot to avoid being a shallow site. | |||
Some of us are more natural explorers .. i don't know if the administrators want to encourage more users to get into these wikis at this stage , i do see where people would want to keep out any destructive wiki users .. | |||
I guess this constitutes a proactively sent , standardised instant message from an administrator .. there is an element of intellectual property in terms of the effort made in writing all this content , that contributors would prefer to see protected from gratuitous destruction , yes ? the wiki structure is obviously packed with potential for workgroups with open agendas ... i often get accused of not giving enough information myself .. | |||
[[User:Moon|Moon]] 13:50, 11 Mar 2006 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:06, 6 January 2013
Description[edit]
'Wiki' .. an online open source , editable community. This page , from the moon.
Add a message or your own content , click 'edit' and type it in (THIS PAGE ONLY) , do it at the bottom , please , these 'instructions' will then remain in view for future new visitors.
Why ?[edit]
I am interested in feedback on the songs and video , sure .. but the interesting experiment here is in how nervous people feel clicking a star (as opposed to a 'play' button ; when did a green triangle for 'go' become the convention ?)
Of course a lot of people may say ' I won't do it ' .. and i do realise that our home flash recordings are slow to load and ideas only , they're not exactly 'gold' at the end of the figurative rainbow .. maybe not enough of a carrot to avoid being a shallow site.
Some of us are more natural explorers .. i don't know if the administrators want to encourage more users to get into these wikis at this stage , i do see where people would want to keep out any destructive wiki users ..
I guess this constitutes a proactively sent , standardised instant message from an administrator .. there is an element of intellectual property in terms of the effort made in writing all this content , that contributors would prefer to see protected from gratuitous destruction , yes ? the wiki structure is obviously packed with potential for workgroups with open agendas ... i often get accused of not giving enough information myself ..
Moon 13:50, 11 Mar 2006 (EST)