User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (archive this stuff) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→The value of discussion: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. | Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. | ||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== The value of discussion == | |||
Discussion is also work, unless not completed and hanging in the air for years. Even then it is work, only without result. Naturally it is easier to do little edits here and there and consider that as work with results rather than coming to a conclusion in a debate since the later requires more staying power. | |||
I do not mind if anybody improves my statements on a talk page like better link format. But whatever I write there should not be changed in the wording and left with my signature. That would be forgery, that is not me any more. My statements are not articles to be edited. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 20:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:27, 13 August 2014
| Archives: | 1, | 2, | 3, | 4, | 5 |
|---|
Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity
I guess I was expecting dozens of people to each insert their pet peeve into the WikiIndex talk:Blocking Policy#draft blocking policy proposal, making it balloon up into a huge monster of complexity.
I am pleasantly surprised that you made it shorter. Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. --DavidCary 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
The value of discussion
Discussion is also work, unless not completed and hanging in the air for years. Even then it is work, only without result. Naturally it is easier to do little edits here and there and consider that as work with results rather than coming to a conclusion in a debate since the later requires more staying power.
I do not mind if anybody improves my statements on a talk page like better link format. But whatever I write there should not be changed in the wording and left with my signature. That would be forgery, that is not me any more. My statements are not articles to be edited. Manorainjan (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)