WikiIndex:Site statistics information: Difference between revisions
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (about our poor performance on covering known wikis) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== WikiFarms and our coverage == | == WikiFarms and our coverage == | ||
Farm - listed - covered - % | Farm - listed - covered - % | ||
[[Gamepedia.com]] - 121 - 16 - 13 % (not all wikis there are listed here, not even all covered ones) | * [[Gamepedia.com]] - 121 - 16 - 13 % (not all wikis there are listed here, not even all covered ones) | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 9 April 2016
On 2 August 2006 MarkDilley proposed here to have this page.
What are statistics for? If You got no goal to reach they are meaningless.
Other people keep stats: http://webnumbr.com/profile?name=http%3A%2F%2Fwikiangela.wordpress.com
It says, amongst other numbers:
- 320,197 Number of active wikis on Wikia.
Now, how many wiki pages did we get on our Index?
- 20,496.
That makes 1/16 or less than 6 %. to be more precise, we got
- 13,545 pages in Category:Wikia that makes 4.2% of all existing Wikia wikis are listed here.
- 28 pages in Category:Wikkii that makes 1.07% of all formerly 3,000+ existing Wikkii wikis are listed here.
And that is about wikis that are/where easy to find because we got the address of the WikiFarms. Calculationg this reverse we shall have
- worldwide more than 760.000 wikis of which we got less than 2,6 %, 20.000 on page. And Wikisphere is growing rapidly.
- How will we gain any significance at our current speed? Never!
Statistics show, that our significance is only imagined or hoped or "envisioned" it is not real.
Wikipedia grew more significant than Encyclopaedia Britannica.
On German and English Wikipedia there is not even a page about us.
WikiFarms and our coverage
Farm - listed - covered - %
- Gamepedia.com - 121 - 16 - 13 % (not all wikis there are listed here, not even all covered ones)