Category talk:Dormant: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (typo) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''Some conversations here were moved from Category talk:Inactive and preserved for history's sake'' | |||
==Untitled== | |||
[[:Category:All]] should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | [[:Category:All]] should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] | ||
You're idea of using an Inactive template put in place and working well! --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:14, 14 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
== inactive template == | |||
Just found out that changing the name of the template to Inactive is all that's needed. The other information doens't need to be removed! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:46, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
== definition? == | |||
Do we need to re-visit the definition of Inactive? Do we need to add another category Offline, or something like that? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:26, 17 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:09, 13 February 2017
- Some conversations here were moved from Category talk:Inactive and preserved for history's sake
Untitled[edit]
Category:All should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, MarkDilley
You're idea of using an Inactive template put in place and working well! --Raymond King | talk 20:14, 14 Feb 2006 (EST)
inactive template[edit]
Just found out that changing the name of the template to Inactive is all that's needed. The other information doens't need to be removed! TedErnst | talk 12:46, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
definition?[edit]
Do we need to re-visit the definition of Inactive? Do we need to add another category Offline, or something like that? TedErnst | talk 16:26, 17 May 2006 (EDT)