Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (use proper Template:NotAWiki rather than direct cat, wikilinks) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (fix red link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:wikitech-l}}<div style=float:right>{{NotAWiki}}</div> | {{DISPLAYTITLE:wikitech-l}}<div style=float:right>{{NotAWiki}}</div> | ||
'''wikitech-l''' is a {{tag|Communications|mailing}} list for the [[:Category:MediaWiki | '''wikitech-l''' is a {{tag|Communications|mailing}} list for the [[:Category:MediaWiki developer|MediaWiki development community]]. The discussion threads tend to get rather lengthy, as people debate implementation options; often the conversations devolve into bike-shedding over insignificant details. Most of the lengthy discussions concerning the most fundamental aspects of {{tag|MediaWiki}} development take place on wikitech-l, rather than places like [[MediaZilla]], although the final debates leading to the ultimate decisions on architecture issues are usually made at synchronous communication venues; such as [[Internet Relay Chat]] (IRC) or {{tag|FaceToFace|in-person}} meetings. Occasionally, someone breaches etiquette, usually by wording a criticism harshly; and dozens of posts follow, debating how bad the etiquette breach was, and whether people are overreacting. | ||
Occasionally, an off-topic thread is launched by someone attempting to spam the listserv with his own theory of ethics or communication techniques, ostensibly as a proposal for adoption by the development community; these tend to attract dozens of comments by people interested in such [[:Category:Meta|meta]]-issues, without resulting in any new [[:Category:Policy|policies]] or [[:Category:WikiConcept|practices]] being agreed upon. | Occasionally, an off-topic thread is launched by someone attempting to spam the listserv with his own theory of ethics or communication techniques, ostensibly as a proposal for adoption by the development community; these tend to attract dozens of comments by people interested in such [[:Category:Meta|meta]]-issues, without resulting in any new [[:Category:Policy|policies]] or [[:Category:WikiConcept|practices]] being agreed upon. | ||
edits