WikiIndex:ProposalArchive: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:




==Proposal: 2006-01-28: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
* More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves.  I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
** I agree and will try to do this --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
* I propose that we are now doing this and this proposal can be moved to a completed proposals area. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 18:37, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)


* We should put this in the '''Guidelines, agreed upon''' area, if I understand that area correctly.


==Proposal: 2006-02-17: Tag and category use==
==Proposal: 2006-02-17: Tag and category use==

Revision as of 05:42, 17 May 2006

These come here once decided at WikiIndex:Proposals.





Proposal: 2006-02-17: Tag and category use

  • Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes, using the tag template.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit&section=1
  • Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping. They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
  1. cleaner for the site/newbies
  2. put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit

Please indicate your approval (or not) here:

Proposal 2-Mar-2006: Wiki Name Redundancy Elimination

Please see Template talk:Wiki for my proposed solution. TedErnst | talk 13:07, 2 Mar 2006 (EST)

After talking with Ray, I implimented this. TedErnst | talk 01:54, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)