Category talk:Wikia: Difference between revisions
(vibrant?) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→vibrant?: respond) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hi, yes Wikia itself is vibrant, but not all of the wikia-wikis are vibrant. --[[User:141.52.232.84|141.52.232.84]] 08:50, 20 June 2006 (EDT) | Hi, yes Wikia itself is vibrant, but not all of the wikia-wikis are vibrant. --[[User:141.52.232.84|141.52.232.84]] 08:50, 20 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Each Wikia wiki has a status link. The Wikia wiki itself is vibrant, that doesn't mean anything is being claimed about any other wiki. Make sense? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
Revision as of 14:54, 20 June 2006
I'm not sure this is doing what we want. I'm totally down with not wanting the sub-category, but this way Wikia doesn't show up at all in category:WikiFarm. TedErnst | talk 01:21, 11 June 2006 (EDT)
- Now that I think of it, maybe all the wiki farm should be in the subcategory, or at least the ones that have wikis for the community... MarkDilley
Alright, but are we talking about a category or a sub-category? In my mind WikiFarm is a Wiki Topic sub-category. Wikia should not be a sub-category of that, I don't think, unless you're suggesting that every wikifarm should be it's own sub-category of WikiFarm, yes? TedErnst | talk 13:41, 11 June 2006 (EDT)
vibrant?
Hi, yes Wikia itself is vibrant, but not all of the wikia-wikis are vibrant. --141.52.232.84 08:50, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
Each Wikia wiki has a status link. The Wikia wiki itself is vibrant, that doesn't mean anything is being claimed about any other wiki. Make sense? Best, MarkDilley