WordPress Wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (Question for Ted) |
(to Mark) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging? It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal? What are your thoughts, Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging? It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal? What are your thoughts, Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: Because it does have active content. It's not disabled, to my knowledge. As long as it's a wiki, I think it should be categorized. It's not important enough to me to "disagree" about, so if you'd like to remove the category, no worries. Just please note that when a category is removed without explanation, my tendency is to put it back, as I did in this case. Your reasoning for not having it is perfectly fine, of course. It just helps me if you state that reason. Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
[[category:blogging]] | [[category:blogging]] | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 28 June 2006
| [{{{URL}}} {{{logo}}}] | [{{{URL}}} WordPress Wiki] [{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | [[:Category:{{{status}}}|{{{status}}}]] |
| Language: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{language}}}|{{{language}}}]] |
| Edit mode: | [[:Category:{{{editmode}}}|{{{editmode}}}]] |
| Wiki engine: | [[:Category:{{{engine}}}|{{{engine}}}]] |
| Wiki license: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{license}}}|{{{license}}}]] |
| Main topic: | [[:Category:{{{maintopic}}}|{{{maintopic}}}]] |
Description
The WordPress (WP) Wiki is a tool provided by the WP developers for the WP community. It is designed to allow users, hackers, and all others to collaborate and communicate.
This wiki is being depreciated, please use WordPress Codex
Ted, why do you want to make an inactive, depreciated wiki, have a category link to blogging? It doesn't make sense to me, seems to be high noise to signal? What are your thoughts, Best, MarkDilley
- Because it does have active content. It's not disabled, to my knowledge. As long as it's a wiki, I think it should be categorized. It's not important enough to me to "disagree" about, so if you'd like to remove the category, no worries. Just please note that when a category is removed without explanation, my tendency is to put it back, as I did in this case. Your reasoning for not having it is perfectly fine, of course. It just helps me if you state that reason. Thanks! TedErnst | talk 18:14, 28 June 2006 (EDT)