Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Talk:WikiNode: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "Category:WikiIdea" to "Category:Wiki idea"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (fix redirect, additional wikilinks) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Category:WikiIdea" to "Category:Wiki idea") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just as I am fond of WikiEngines going into the [[:Category:Wiki | Just as I am fond of WikiEngines going into the [[:Category:Wiki engine]], I like the idea of our WikiNode pointing to the WikiNodes page. Just like the front page is WikiIndex. Both ideas are similar in a way that I can't articulate very well at the moment. (I am trying to create a visual. [[Talk:FooMarksIdeaOnTheRecursiveNatureOfWikiWithExamplesCategoryWikiEngineWikiIndexFrontPageAndWikiNodeToWikiNodesWikiHmmmmm]]) [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
{{ | {{TOC right}} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
here is the dump from SwitchWiki:WikiNode to be intergrated here perhaps: | here is the dump from SwitchWiki:WikiNode to be intergrated here perhaps: | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
: Would be great if you could say who you are and why you feel that way. Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:38, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) | : Would be great if you could say who you are and why you feel that way. Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:38, 10 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
First is that I think of them as basic [[:Category: | First is that I think of them as basic [[:Category:Wiki idea|wiki ideas]], deserving of place in the "main" namespace. Second, all of our neighbors are simply '''WikiNode''' - not '''WikiWikiWeb:WikiNode''' and '''RecentChangesCamp:WikiNode'''. For those reasons I am moving the page back. I am still interested in why you think it should be a meta page. [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: Those wikis don't use namespaces. We do. Our [[WikiNode]] is not a basic wiki idea. The WikiNodesNetwork is the basic wiki idea and [[WikiNode]] or [[WikiNodes Wiki|WikiNodes]] such as heck do belong in the main namespace and should be about the whole network, not just our WikiNode. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:09, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | : Those wikis don't use namespaces. We do. Our [[WikiNode]] is not a basic wiki idea. The WikiNodesNetwork is the basic wiki idea and [[WikiNode]] or [[WikiNodes Wiki|WikiNodes]] such as heck do belong in the main namespace and should be about the whole network, not just our WikiNode. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:09, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
: Maybe a direct link to the origins of the idea would help, http://wikinode.info Best, [[MarkDilley]] | : Maybe a direct link to the origins of the idea would help, http://wikinode.info Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:: The page [[WikiProject:Wiki-Noding]] *should* have an explanation of the WikiNode Network. When you say "the explanation is very sketchy", do you mean that the explanation here on the [[WikiNode]] page is too brief, and we need to spell out in this "WikiNode" page a more detailed explanation? Or can this be fixed by a more prominent link from this page to "WikiProject:Wiki-Noding", which already has more detailed explanation? Or are you saying that you already found "WikiProject:Wiki-Noding" and even that explanation needs more details? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 19:05, 16 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
:::I think the WikiNode is an interesting idea that would work only if a good number of wiki-people would propagate and teach it actively. This idea does not propagate itself. And those two people who stated it, where not even able to maintain their own websites. they do absolutely nothing to see their ideas through. Therefore, practically speaking, the idea is a dead end. It sounds nice but does not work. The wikispehre is only a catchphrase, it does not practically exist, has no structure. Just like saying "the average man" it is something entirely virtual. If wikispehre would be an abstract for something that really existed, than the number of WikiNodes would grow with exponential speed. If an organization would expedite the creation of WikiNodes, it would help wikisphere to get real. But, as one can see easily by the extremely poor performance of this wiki, the imaginary wiki of wikis, there is no manpower, no structure, no speed, noting mentionable to make the difference. therefore it will remain not much more than an idea in the heads of a handful people and will wither away. [[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 03:44, 17 May 2016 (PDT) | |||
==Dead links== | ==Dead links== | ||
| Line 87: | Line 91: | ||
==Thinking of connecting to other wiki hubs== | ==Thinking of connecting to other wiki hubs== | ||
* [http://smw.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page Semantic MediaWiki Community Wiki] | * [http://smw.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page Semantic MediaWiki Community Wiki] | ||
== no need for a frankly obscure language? == | |||
Why was the Filipino language version deleted? | |||
Are we not happy with every additional translation we can get? | |||
I thought this is to be an international wiki. --[[User talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:13, 13 November 2017 (PST) | |||