Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:MarkDilley/Archive3: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "Wiki Status" to "Wiki status"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "UnknownEngine" to "Unknown engine") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki Status" to "Wiki status") |
||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
I didn't know it was possible to have folksonomy in the structured data. I learn so much from you! Doesn't it need to now be listed as one of our status categoires? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:39, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | I didn't know it was possible to have folksonomy in the structured data. I learn so much from you! Doesn't it need to now be listed as one of our status categoires? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:39, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
:''I can't help to feel you are poking fun at me, surely in a good natured way! It should be listed in the [[:Category:Wiki | :''I can't help to feel you are poking fun at me, surely in a good natured way! It should be listed in the [[:Category:Wiki status|status category]] once folks settle with it, but I am not sure folks are settling with it, let's put it on the call tonight to have a chat.'' | ||
Not poking fun. You saw my reaction to "Building". I changed it to active. You changed it back and I am seeing now that that's how things evolve with wiki. We can't, even if we wanted to, control everything and decide in advance how things are going to work. In some ways it's strange that we have structured data at all. So far I think this is the first example of a structured data category being created by someone other than "us." That's pretty cool if we let it happen. Good stuff. And sorry that it felt like I was poking fun. Your radical inclusiveness is somehow not obvious to me, yet it's definitely where I want to go. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:38, 12 June 2006 (EDT) | Not poking fun. You saw my reaction to "Building". I changed it to active. You changed it back and I am seeing now that that's how things evolve with wiki. We can't, even if we wanted to, control everything and decide in advance how things are going to work. In some ways it's strange that we have structured data at all. So far I think this is the first example of a structured data category being created by someone other than "us." That's pretty cool if we let it happen. Good stuff. And sorry that it felt like I was poking fun. Your radical inclusiveness is somehow not obvious to me, yet it's definitely where I want to go. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:38, 12 June 2006 (EDT) | ||