Category talk:Wiki language: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Fixing signature :-)
m (Interwiki template)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Should there be a distinction between wikis that are bilingual (e.g. [[WikiIndex]]-English & French), multilingual (e.g. [[Wikimedia Commons]]-multiple languages used within the same wiki), and multiple languages (e.g. most [[Wikimedia Foundation]] projects, such as the [[Wikipedia]] that have versions in different languages [as subdomains])? [[User:BlankVerse]] | <small>[[User talk:BlankVerse|talk]]</small> 00:44, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
{{Talk header}}{{TOC right}}
==Distinction?==
Should there be a distinction between wikis that are bilingual (e.g. [[WikiIndex]]: English & French), multilingual (e.g. [[Wikimedia Commons]]: multiple languages used within the same wiki), and multiple languages (e.g. most [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] projects, such as the [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] that have versions in different languages [as subdomains])? [[User:BlankVerse]] | <small>[[User talk:BlankVerse|talk]]</small> 00:44, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)


== Merge to "Language"? ==
==Merge to "Language"?==
 
Wiki Language is confusing - sounds like it's about wiki markup or some such thing. Merge into [[:category: Language]]? Articles in Category:Language can stay in the root [[category]], and the subcategory can be for specific languages. --[[User:Singkong2005|Chris Watkins a.k.a. Singkong2005]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Singkong2005|talk]]</sup></small> 21:39, 2 September 2006 (EDT)
Wiki Language is confusing - sounds like it's about wiki markup or some such thing. Merge into [[:Category:Language]]? Articles in [[:Category:Language]] can stay in the root category, and the subcategory can be for specific languages. --[[User:Singkong2005|Chris Watkins a.k.a. Singkong2005]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Singkong2005|talk]]</sup></small> 21:39, 2 September 2006 (EDT)


: Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 21:40, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
: Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 21:40, 3 September 2006 (EDT)


== "Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin" ==
==Category:Latin vs Category:Wiki Latin==
===Language category simplification proposal===
Someone is starting to set up two parallel [[Special:Categories|categories]] of languages.
*categories like "[[:Category: Wiki Latin]]"
*categories like "[[:Category: Latin]]"


Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages.
Alas, currently most articles in such [[categories]] are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag.
* categories like "[[:Category: Wiki Latin]]"
* categories like "[[:Category: Latin]]"


Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag.
;Category simplification proposal
 
*Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps [[:category: Linguistic]] or [[:category: Language]].
Category simplification proposal:
*Get rid of all the 'Category:Wiki Latin' and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler [[:Category:Latin]] and similar categories.
* Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps [[:Category: linguistic]] or [[:Category: language]].
* Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories.


Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion.
Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion.
Line 23: Line 24:
Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest.
Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest.


Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing?
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST)
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 
:I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a [[:category: Linguistic]] or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
 
==Could we use some system of ISO codes?==
'''[[:Category: Wiki language]]''' Rather than use only English names (easy for navigation but arbitrary and defeats multi-lingualism), we could use some system of ISO codes such as 'Category:en (English)', 'Category:de (German, Deutsch)', 'Category:es (Spanish, español)', 'Category:zh (Chinese, 中文)'. This would have some consistency and standardization while also allowing English to remain a {{Cambridge-Dictionary|lingua franca}} and let users find content in their own language. Thoughts? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 16:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
: I think this is a fantastic idea.  What can folks do to help? ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
:: '''Converting''' I think it would be easy to do by myself. I'll leave this conversation here for a week or two and see if there's more feedback. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 00:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is a good idea. Previous attempts of extended multilingual efforts on WikiIndex failed.  The German de.WikiIndex.org failed, as did French & Swedish translations - despite having active editors in those languages.
 
I would also expect that only a tiny minority of folks <u>fully</u> understand ISO language codes.  --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 23:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
: '''Language sorting''' Then how should we sort them? Do we want this site to be multi-lingual? I would certainly hope so. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 05:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
:: I look at is as an "easy" way to take a step in that direction.  Makes it more friendly to multi-linguists. Or at least that is the perception I have. ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
(imported from the community news page)


:I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a [[:Category:Linguistics]] or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
{{Category discussions}}
[[Category:Proposals]]

Latest revision as of 18:30, 12 July 2023

this talk page is for discussing improvements to the Category:Wiki language article

Distinction?[edit]

Should there be a distinction between wikis that are bilingual (e.g. WikiIndex: English & French), multilingual (e.g. Wikimedia Commons: multiple languages used within the same wiki), and multiple languages (e.g. most Wikimedia Foundation projects, such as the Wikipedia that have versions in different languages [as subdomains])? User:BlankVerse | talk 00:44, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)

Merge to "Language"?[edit]

Wiki Language is confusing - sounds like it's about wiki markup or some such thing. Merge into category: Language? Articles in Category:Language can stay in the root category, and the subcategory can be for specific languages. --Chris Watkins a.k.a. Singkong2005 talk 21:39, 2 September 2006 (EDT)

Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me! TedErnst | talk 21:40, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Category:Latin vs Category:Wiki Latin[edit]

Language category simplification proposal[edit]

Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages.

Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag.

Category simplification proposal
  • Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps category: Linguistic or category: Language.
  • Get rid of all the 'Category:Wiki Latin' and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler Category:Latin and similar categories.

Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion.

Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest.

Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing? --DavidCary 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST)

I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a category: Linguistic or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --MarvelZuvembie 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

Could we use some system of ISO codes?[edit]

Category: Wiki language Rather than use only English names (easy for navigation but arbitrary and defeats multi-lingualism), we could use some system of ISO codes such as 'Category:en (English)', 'Category:de (German, Deutsch)', 'Category:es (Spanish, español)', 'Category:zh (Chinese, 中文)'. This would have some consistency and standardization while also allowing English to remain a lingua franca and let users find content in their own language. Thoughts? Koavf (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I think this is a fantastic idea. What can folks do to help? ~~ MarkDilley
Converting I think it would be easy to do by myself. I'll leave this conversation here for a week or two and see if there's more feedback. Koavf (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure this is a good idea. Previous attempts of extended multilingual efforts on WikiIndex failed. The German de.WikiIndex.org failed, as did French & Swedish translations - despite having active editors in those languages.

I would also expect that only a tiny minority of folks fully understand ISO language codes. --Sean, aka Hoof HeartedAdmin / 'Crattalk2HH 23:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Language sorting Then how should we sort them? Do we want this site to be multi-lingual? I would certainly hope so. Koavf (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
I look at is as an "easy" way to take a step in that direction. Makes it more friendly to multi-linguists. Or at least that is the perception I have. ~~ MarkDilley

(imported from the community news page)

Template: Category discussions[edit]

Note: in order to assist readability of included talk pages, please ensure the template rendering this table is kept at the BOTTOM of the displayed page (manually move to bottom if required).
This is the text of the Template: Category discussions. It is intended to connect the various discussions about categories here on WikiIndex that are taking place (or have previously taken place) on various pages. Please also see WikiIndex: How do categories work, and how to use our {{Tag}} template. If you find a discussion on categories which does not display this message box, please add this template by copying the following {{Category discussions}}, and pasting at the bottom of the edit box on the required talk page, and then go edit this template to include it, and summarise the discussion you found. The following discussions have taken, or are taking place:

You can also check all pages that link to this template (using the backlink function).