Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
WikiIndex talk:About: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Interwiki templates) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:The [[Special:Namespace]]s page was something that appeared briefly in one fork (1.6-wikidata) of [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]]. It allowed [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|bureaucrats]] to take control of the list of namespaces directly from the web interface instead of editing LocalSettings.php. The {{Mw|Extension:Simple namespaces|version currently on uncyclopedia.info}} is just a kludge based on the [[Special:Interwiki]] extension. | :The [[Special:Namespace]]s page was something that appeared briefly in one fork (1.6-wikidata) of [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]]. It allowed [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|bureaucrats]] to take control of the list of namespaces directly from the web interface instead of editing LocalSettings.php. The {{Mw|Extension:Simple namespaces|version currently on uncyclopedia.info}} is just a kludge based on the [[Special:Interwiki]] extension. | ||
:As for the namespaces themselves? The actual descriptions of each individual [[wiki]] in this index should be in a separate namespace from vanity articles about [[:Category:Wiki | :As for the namespaces themselves? The actual descriptions of each individual [[wiki]] in this index should be in a separate namespace from vanity articles about [[:Category:Wiki people|people]], user pages or anything else that isn't an actual wiki description. JMHO. YMMV. --[[User:Carlb|Carlb]] 13:33, 15 December 2006 (EST) | ||
==Still stuck== | ==Still stuck== | ||
re: ''Generally, administrative "[[:Category:Meta|meta]]" pages like this one, which provide supporting information about the task of building WikiIndex, are in the "project" namespace, so people wanting to browse by using the "[[Special:Random|random page]]" button will find [[wiki]]s or [[:Category:Wiki | re: ''Generally, administrative "[[:Category:Meta|meta]]" pages like this one, which provide supporting information about the task of building WikiIndex, are in the "project" namespace, so people wanting to browse by using the "[[Special:Random|random page]]" button will find [[wiki]]s or [[:Category:Wiki people|people]], not instructions or discussions.'' | ||
I think that there are conversations and 'meta' pages that I would like to see in the main namespace. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | I think that there are conversations and 'meta' pages that I would like to see in the main namespace. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Do you mean that it's not a general [[:Category:Encyclopedia|encyclopedia]], or that it's not even an encyclopedia of [[wiki]]s? When I think of an encyclopedia, I think of a site that, even though it may restrict its scope to certain topics, will cover those topics thoroughly (hence the name "encyclopedia"; "encyclopedic" mean "comprehensive in terms of information"). [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] deletes a lot of articles for non-notability, but once it decides to have an article on a topic, it tends to go all-out; e.g. {{Wp|White & Nerdy#Music video}} contains a lot of information that could be considered [[cruft]] (they've actually dialed it back a bit, because it used to contain even more information; but still, there's a lot of stuff there that could be considered trivia). | Do you mean that it's not a general [[:Category:Encyclopedia|encyclopedia]], or that it's not even an encyclopedia of [[wiki]]s? When I think of an encyclopedia, I think of a site that, even though it may restrict its scope to certain topics, will cover those topics thoroughly (hence the name "encyclopedia"; "encyclopedic" mean "comprehensive in terms of information"). [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] deletes a lot of articles for non-notability, but once it decides to have an article on a topic, it tends to go all-out; e.g. {{Wp|White & Nerdy#Music video}} contains a lot of information that could be considered [[cruft]] (they've actually dialed it back a bit, because it used to contain even more information; but still, there's a lot of stuff there that could be considered trivia). | ||
But it seems like WikiIndex wants to limit its entries to basic facts about the [[WhatIsWiki|wikis]] and [[:Category:Wiki | But it seems like WikiIndex wants to limit its entries to basic facts about the [[WhatIsWiki|wikis]] and [[:Category:Wiki people|wiki people]] in question. (There aren't a lot of articles here about [[:Category:Wiki idea|wiki ideas]], and none of those articles are very long, so there's not much precedent to show how a lengthy article about a wiki idea would be handled; but we've had a few long articles about wikis and wiki people, which were cut down). The solution is usually, in the case of pages about wikis, to link to an off-wiki [[about page]]; or in the case of wiki people, to link to an off-wiki [[user page]]. | ||
If that's the direction you want to go in, fine. The site is, after all, Wiki "Index"; an index usually only contains very short blurbs, with a few statistics, about its subject matter. But we should clarify this in the about page, so people know. | If that's the direction you want to go in, fine. The site is, after all, Wiki "Index"; an index usually only contains very short blurbs, with a few statistics, about its subject matter. But we should clarify this in the about page, so people know. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
An index tends to be boring reading, even though it may lead you in the direction of interesting content. An encyclopedia tends to be more interesting reading, as there is a lot to explore without needing to leave the encyclopedia. But both indexes and encyclopedias have their separate uses. Most of us come to wiki articles by means of Google, which is an index; and even wiki encyclopedias have their own indexes (e.g. categories). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 15:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC) | An index tends to be boring reading, even though it may lead you in the direction of interesting content. An encyclopedia tends to be more interesting reading, as there is a lot to explore without needing to leave the encyclopedia. But both indexes and encyclopedias have their separate uses. Most of us come to wiki articles by means of Google, which is an index; and even wiki encyclopedias have their own indexes (e.g. categories). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 15:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
Mostly it means that this is a [[:Category:Community|community]] of wiki people writing about wiki. [[:Category:Wiki | Mostly it means that this is a [[:Category:Community|community]] of wiki people writing about wiki. [[:Category:Wiki age|Wiki was around]] for 6-7 years before [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] and [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] - Wiki is not defined by Wikipedia, it is the other way around. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:There are a lot of different ways of "writing about wiki", though. Wikipedia uses an encyclopedia format to do so, with articles like {{Wp|Citizendium}}, {{Wp|Jimbo Wales}}, {{Wp|history of wikis}}, etc. My question is basically, should WikiIndex pages be full-fledged encyclopedia articles that can cover the subjects in their entirety, or are they just supposed to be a template with some statistics and links; a few sentences very briefly describing the wiki, wiki person, or wiki idea; and a bunch of categories? Even if the scope of WikiIndex is limited to wikis, wiki people, and wiki ideas, that doesn't prevent it from being an encyclopedia ''that is limited to covering those topics''. | :There are a lot of different ways of "writing about wiki", though. Wikipedia uses an encyclopedia format to do so, with articles like {{Wp|Citizendium}}, {{Wp|Jimbo Wales}}, {{Wp|history of wikis}}, etc. My question is basically, should WikiIndex pages be full-fledged encyclopedia articles that can cover the subjects in their entirety, or are they just supposed to be a template with some statistics and links; a few sentences very briefly describing the wiki, wiki person, or wiki idea; and a bunch of categories? Even if the scope of WikiIndex is limited to wikis, wiki people, and wiki ideas, that doesn't prevent it from being an encyclopedia ''that is limited to covering those topics''. | ||