User talk:Peu: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(my reason) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: yes it can, but should it be??? I found it greeaat tooo, but the new wiki-box is... | : yes it can, but should it be??? I found it greeaat tooo, but the new wiki-box is... | ||
:...(will be) now flexible enough to add new fields if needed. Lets watch TourBusStops a little... --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 16:51, 21 October 2006 (EDT) | :...(will be) now flexible enough to add new fields if needed. Lets watch TourBusStops a little... --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 16:51, 21 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
: The tour bus stops in teh world are finite and known. If someone's going to be adding any of them here, they might as well be in the wiki template, even if it's just for 5 or 10 sites. They don't have to appear in the template that it's unknown, right? Let's just leave the template blank if that field doesn't appear. In fact, that might be a good thing to do for the size field as well, leave the structured data box blank. I don't have a problem with a SizeUnknown field, but I don't think there's any reason to have a TourBusStop unknown. The reason to add it now is so it doesn't have to be converted later, should we decide to add it, and many sites already have a TBS listed on their page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:29, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:29, 21 October 2006
Size
Size was something proposed by a sometime contributor and it's never really caught on. Maybe your proposal could be the spark that Size needs to get started? Maybe there isn't enough energy here for yet another method of categorization. I'd say go for it, if you like, especially if you can do some without breaking any others. TedErnst | talk 17:04, 17 October 2006 (EDT)
- thanks, I will try to size something --Peu 17:11, 17 October 2006 (EDT)
Using your name
Thanks, Wolf!! TedErnst | talk 11:51, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
tour bus
can the tour bus stops also be added as an optional field in the wiki template? TedErnst | talk 09:13, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
- yes it can, but should it be??? I found it greeaat tooo, but the new wiki-box is...
- ...(will be) now flexible enough to add new fields if needed. Lets watch TourBusStops a little... --Peu 16:51, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
- The tour bus stops in teh world are finite and known. If someone's going to be adding any of them here, they might as well be in the wiki template, even if it's just for 5 or 10 sites. They don't have to appear in the template that it's unknown, right? Let's just leave the template blank if that field doesn't appear. In fact, that might be a good thing to do for the size field as well, leave the structured data box blank. I don't have a problem with a SizeUnknown field, but I don't think there's any reason to have a TourBusStop unknown. The reason to add it now is so it doesn't have to be converted later, should we decide to add it, and many sites already have a TBS listed on their page. TedErnst | talk 18:29, 21 October 2006 (EDT)