Template talk:Tag: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cannot forget on it)
(usefulness of this template)
Line 11: Line 11:
It seems you want to have some tags inline.  We could have a [[Template:Inline-Tag]] for that.  The current tag template is for bulletted lists.  Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
It seems you want to have some tags inline.  We could have a [[Template:Inline-Tag]] for that.  The current tag template is for bulletted lists.  Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
:I think these tags are not really wonderful, you have to use the name of the category within the text, that's stupid. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 14:20, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
:I think these tags are not really wonderful, you have to use the name of the category within the text, that's stupid. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 14:20, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
:: If the name of the category you want appears on the page, use the tag template.  If not, they just use a standard category at the bottom of the page.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:52, 27 October 2006 (EDT)


:Take a tour to what linkes to this template [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Tag]]: there are pages that mainly belong to non-existing categories. In my opinion this (oat first glance) helpful template generates much work. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:34, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
:Take a tour to what linkes to this template [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Tag]]: there are pages that mainly belong to non-existing categories. In my opinion this (oat first glance) helpful template generates much work. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:34, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
:: I'm not understanding how it creates more work.  Could you please say more?

Revision as of 21:52, 27 October 2006

Tags are wonderful!

There are some issues that we have to sort out.

  • tags within the text of descriptions are desireable.
    • if this is true, how do we code a tag so as to be seemless in the text of the description. see DreamHost for testing.
  • tags that are bullet listed are desireable.

It seems you want to have some tags inline. We could have a Template:Inline-Tag for that. The current tag template is for bulletted lists. Elsewhere, you seem to want tags to not show up on the page at all, which doesn't need a template, just put the category:whatever somewhere on the page (anywhere!). TedErnst 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)

I think these tags are not really wonderful, you have to use the name of the category within the text, that's stupid. --Peu | talk 14:20, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
If the name of the category you want appears on the page, use the tag template. If not, they just use a standard category at the bottom of the page. TedErnst | talk 17:52, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
Take a tour to what linkes to this template Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Tag: there are pages that mainly belong to non-existing categories. In my opinion this (oat first glance) helpful template generates much work. --Peu | talk 17:34, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
I'm not understanding how it creates more work. Could you please say more?