Template talk:Tag: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(revised old comments to bring up to date) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: I'm not understanding how it creates more work. Could you please say more? | :: I'm not understanding how it creates more work. Could you please say more? | ||
::: Ted, sometimes you have to create the cats and link it to ''existing'' cats, otherwise you cannot find them without visiting the categorized wiki page itself, or looking on wanted cats. The categorization is only useful if it make at least one hierarchical tree. --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 18:10, 27 October 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:10, 27 October 2006
This template is for inline tags. If you don't want tags to show up on the page at all, just put the [[category:whatever]] at the bottom of the page. TedErnst 21:37, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) (edited to bring up to date TedErnst | talk 17:54, 27 October 2006 (EDT))
- I think these tags are not really wonderful, you have to use the name of the category within the text, that's stupid. --Peu | talk 14:20, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
- Take a tour to what linkes to this template Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Tag: there are pages that mainly belong to non-existing categories. In my opinion this (oat first glance) helpful template generates much work. --Peu | talk 17:34, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
- I'm not understanding how it creates more work. Could you please say more?
- Ted, sometimes you have to create the cats and link it to existing cats, otherwise you cannot find them without visiting the categorized wiki page itself, or looking on wanted cats. The categorization is only useful if it make at least one hierarchical tree. --Peu | talk 18:10, 27 October 2006 (EDT)