Category talk:Wiki people: Difference between revisions
m (Reverted edits by 200.238.102.162 (Talk); changed back to last version by TedErnst) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::: Could you say more about why you feel this way and what the ramifications are if we make the change your suggest, or if we don't? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> | ::: Could you say more about why you feel this way and what the ramifications are if we make the change your suggest, or if we don't? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> | ||
I just realized something. User: namespace pages have extra links in the toolbox on the left side of the page "User contributions" and the always useful "E-mail this user". We lose those by using the main namespace. I suppose we '''could''' manually put up links like [[Special:Contributions/Sean Fennel]] and [[Special:Emailuser/Sean Fennel]], but I don't know if I like having to do that. I suppose the [[Wikipedia:Help:Pipe trick|pipe trick]] might help, but.... | I just realized something. User: namespace pages have extra links in the toolbox on the left side of the page "User contributions" and the always useful "E-mail this user". We lose those by using the main namespace. I suppose we '''could''' manually put up links like [[Special:Contributions/Sean Fennel]] and [[Special:Emailuser/Sean Fennel]], but I don't know if I like having to do that. I suppose the [[Wikipedia:Help:Pipe trick|pipe trick]] might help, but.... | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 7 June 2007
... I don't think I like the user:MarkDilley stuff, I think Ray and Johns looks cleaner MarkDilley
Yes, it looks cleaner that way, but this is not a wiki about us, the people writing the site. It's about the wikis themselves. I can go with whatever you like, but mediawiki has some features that it's nice to use and not have to work around, like the comment notification, which can only work in teh user namespace. Also, we have to decide if this conversation is okay have or need to be on the talk page. TedErnst 17:36, 18 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Right, it is not about us, but we are in the community, so if I put my interests down on my user page, I think that article pages wouldn't reference my user page. I feel like that is a bummer. I like the current work around I have for my namespace (front lawn) to be MarkDilley and my comment space to be talk:MarkDilley. ;-)
Yes, your workaround is fine with me. And if that's the convention we're going to use, no problem. Could you say more about your reasoning here? Article pages wouldn't reference your user page? What does that mean? TedErnst 11:50, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
- That convention is not great as it doesn't separate a neutral view of Mark Dilley from his own self-maintained user page as Wikipedia does. You can only adopt it if you are willing to let every user control the description of themselves absolutely.
I just realized something. User: namespace pages have extra links in the toolbox on the left side of the page "User contributions" and the always useful "E-mail this user". We lose those by using the main namespace. I suppose we could manually put up links like Special:Contributions/Sean Fennel and Special:Emailuser/Sean Fennel, but I don't know if I like having to do that. I suppose the pipe trick might help, but....