WikiIndex talk:Proposals: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use==
==17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use==
* Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or bulleted list
* Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes.


example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit&section=1
* Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping.  They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
** 1- cleaner for the site/newbies
** 2- put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit


== 14-Feb-2006: Structured data ==
== 14-Feb-2006: Structured data ==

Revision as of 04:52, 18 February 2006

17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use

  • Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes.

example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit&section=1

  • Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping. They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
    • 1- cleaner for the site/newbies
    • 2- put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.

example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit

14-Feb-2006: Structured data

13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories

29-Jan-2006: New categories production

  • We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch. MarkDilley
    • Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --Ray 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)

28-Jan-2006: Coding comments for more transparent clarity

  • More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves. I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) MarkDilley