WikiIndex talk:Proposals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use: using the tag template) |
(→14-Feb-2006: Structured data: I don't know what this is) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== 14-Feb-2006: Structured data == | == 14-Feb-2006: Structured data == | ||
* What would the definition be for [[StructuredData]] | * What would the definition be for [[StructuredData]] | ||
** I don't know what this is (and yes, I've read the page). [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:01, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
== 13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories == | == 13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories == | ||
Revision as of 05:01, 18 February 2006
17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use
- Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes, using the tag template.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit§ion=1
- Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping. They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
- 1- cleaner for the site/newbies
- 2- put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit
14-Feb-2006: Structured data
- What would the definition be for StructuredData
13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories
- see Category:Spanish discussion for more info/example.
29-Jan-2006: New categories production
- We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch. MarkDilley
- Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --Ray 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Sure, that makes sense --Raymond King | talk 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
- All this messy stuff can be moved to How do categories work and we can decide what to do. Is that the right place? TedErnst 13:04, 23 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Sure, that makes sense --Raymond King | talk 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
- Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --Ray 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
28-Jan-2006: Coding comments for more transparent clarity
- More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves. I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) MarkDilley
- I agree and will try to do this --Raymond King | talk 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)