6,456
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
(reworking) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== footer/inline == | |||
If you do it this way with that footer, then we don't need the tag template at all. We just put the categories in anywhere on the page. The tag template is only used when we want the category to show up on the page, the way John's been talking about. peace, [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:32, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | If you do it this way with that footer, then we don't need the tag template at all. We just put the categories in anywhere on the page. The tag template is only used when we want the category to show up on the page, the way John's been talking about. peace, [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 21:32, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
Yes, that's right, use tag or category template when you want it to show in the article in addition to the bottom category section, else normal category command is fine --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 17:34, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | Yes, that's right, use tag or category template when you want it to show in the article in addition to the bottom category section, else normal category command is fine --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 17:34, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
==Difference between tag and category== | ==Difference between tag and category== | ||
Is there any? [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 17:14, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | Is there any? [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 17:14, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
No, in this wiki "tag" is a synonym for "category" and the "tag" and "category" templates are the same. We did that because "category" sounds heirarchical whereas "tag" is not. "tag" is also shorter and easier to use. But I am concerned that the extra confusion isn't worth it and we should just stick to category since that's the mediawiki standard. Thoughts welcome --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 17:34, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | No, in this wiki "tag" is a synonym for "category" and the "tag" and "category" templates are the same. We did that because "category" sounds heirarchical whereas "tag" is not. "tag" is also shorter and easier to use. But I am concerned that the extra confusion isn't worth it and we should just stick to category since that's the mediawiki standard. Thoughts welcome --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 17:34, 12 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
: | : Ray, I'm not sure I agree. In fact, I'd like to propose we get rid of the category template to better differentiate between inline tags (using the tag template) and mediawiki categories (using the category function) that only show up in the footer. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:40, 17 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
== tag/category news == | == tag/category news == | ||
edits