WikiIndex:Proposals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:: I still don't understand. How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:11, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | :: I still don't understand. How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:11, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
== Proposal: 2006-02-17 ordering on this page == | |||
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
* I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | |||
** Mark, if this was moved to the archive in error, please move it back to the [[Proposals]] page so it can be further discussed. I also invite you to go further in your reasoning as it's feeling like "because I said so" again. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:47, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
'''Yes''', and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "ProposalArchive" or something like that --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
* ProposalArchive and [[Guidelines, agreed upon]] would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | |||
== Proposal: 2006-02-18 EditModes == | == Proposal: 2006-02-18 EditModes == |
Revision as of 03:51, 20 February 2006
Proposal: 2006-01-29: New categories production
- We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch. MarkDilley
- Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --Ray 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
Proposal: 2006-02-13: Authentic language categories
- see Category:Spanish discussion for more info/example.
Proposal: 2006-02-13: Image links
moved from StartUp Issues TedErnst | talk 12:14, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
- Map the WikiLogo to the Wiki_url, so as to have the additional link to their front page. MarkDilley
- Does anyone think it would be a) a good idea to map the logo image in the template to wiki_URL = and b) is it even possible to do such a crazy thing? :-) MarkDilley | talk
- Have heard this is not with in the knowledge of us, if it is even possilbe.
- Does anyone think it would be a) a good idea to map the logo image in the template to wiki_URL = and b) is it even possible to do such a crazy thing? :-) MarkDilley | talk
Proposal: 2006-02-14: Structured data
- What would the definition be for StructuredData
- Trying to clarify that because this site uses structured data, some things are done a little differently than other wiki. (wikipedia, meatball, etc). I think Structured Data is new to the wiki family, it is to me, so being clear about it will help.
Proposal: 2006-02-17 ordering on this page
I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page. Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages. That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page. Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. TedErnst | talk 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
- I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. MarkDilley | talk
Yes, and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "ProposalArchive" or something like that --Raymond King | talk 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
- ProposalArchive and Guidelines, agreed upon would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. MarkDilley | talk
Proposal: 2006-02-18 EditModes
Please see Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode#current for a proposal to collape Censored, InvitationOnly, Membership, Subscription, RequestLogin and Restricted to ApprovalRequired or some other suitable name. TedErnst | talk 12:23, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
Proposal: 2006-02-18 License
I propose we drop the NC from the Creative Commons license. TedErnst | talk 15:48, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
Can we discuss, I'm not sure I understand the rationale for this --Raymond King | talk 18:38, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
Proposal 2006-02-18 Work in Progress
Let's revist what we're doing in each pass and re-do this sheet. --Raymond King | talk 02:14, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)
Proposal 2006-02-18 Glossary
I propose we make a Glossary with all of the WikiIndex terms so people don't get mixed up with stuff like "Private" vs. "Personal", etc. --Raymond King | talk 02:18, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)
Proposal 2006-02-19 Good Examples
How about we make a page with "Good Examples" so that people get an idea of how to make a great article? --Raymond King | talk 12:44, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)