Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
Eros of Fire (talk | contribs) (The Barack Obama addition is not needed, it already explains they do not like liberals, and Obama is one) |
(Added editor's guidelines. Feel free to edit them to be slightly less obviously insulting, as I called 'em as I see 'em.) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia had 11,005 valid registered users (not counting 11,086 blocked accounts), of which 30 (or 0.27%) are Administrators. | As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia had 11,005 valid registered users (not counting 11,086 blocked accounts), of which 30 (or 0.27%) are Administrators. | ||
==Guidelines for prospective editors== | |||
* Make your username a first name and last initial. Make sure they sound sufficiently white-bread not to rouse a sysops's suspicion. | |||
* Before making ANY comments on a talk page, edit or create at least 10 other pages, to avoid violating the [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:90/10_rule "90/10" rule]. | |||
* NEVER put {{fact}} tags on an article that was recently edited by a sysop. They will take it as a personal insult that their word isn't good enough for you. | |||
* Don't bother correcting factual errors by sysops. They'll just block you and put them back. | |||
* Never, EVER suggest that Liberals are anything other than Evil Incarnate. | |||
By following these guidelines, you can spend many <strike>productive</strike> hours editing Conservapedia! | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize Conservapedia and also to criticize pseudo-science in general. | *[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize Conservapedia and also to criticize pseudo-science in general. | ||
[[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]][[Category:FoundedIn2006]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | [[Category:Political]][[Category:Christianity]][[Category:FoundedIn2006]][[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 27 November 2008
| [{{{URL}}} {{{logo}}}] | [{{{URL}}} Conservapedia] [{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | [[:Category:{{{status}}}|{{{status}}}]] |
| Language: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{language}}}|{{{language}}}]] |
| Edit mode: | [[:Category:{{{editmode}}}|{{{editmode}}}]] |
| Wiki engine: | [[:Category:{{{engine}}}|{{{engine}}}]] |
| Wiki license: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{license}}}|{{{license}}}]] |
| Main topic: | [[:Category:{{{maintopic}}}|{{{maintopic}}}]] |
Conservapedia is an encyclopedia written with a conservative viewpoint; specifically, Conservapedia's articles are politically conservative, friendly to young Earth creationism and conservative Christianity, and USA-centric. Conservapedia is in general hostile to liberals, homosexuals, and people who support or teach the theory of evolution.
The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly and a group of homeschooled people to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, pro-Evolution, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of Wikipedia. The stated purpose of the site is to provide a family-friendly resource for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, a few more adult topics such as homosexuality are also treated in depth.
Every edit on Conservapedia is scrutinized by the administrators for potential liberal bias. As a result, Conservapedia cannot be edited during nighttime, U.S. time, except by users with special "night editing" rights, to prevent vandals from striking when all or most of the administrators are asleep.
Statistics
| Wiki size: | unknown size |
As of 31 July 2008, Conservapedia had 11,005 valid registered users (not counting 11,086 blocked accounts), of which 30 (or 0.27%) are Administrators.
Guidelines for prospective editors
- Make your username a first name and last initial. Make sure they sound sufficiently white-bread not to rouse a sysops's suspicion.
- Before making ANY comments on a talk page, edit or create at least 10 other pages, to avoid violating the "90/10" rule.
- NEVER put [citation requested] tags on an article that was recently edited by a sysop. They will take it as a personal insult that their word isn't good enough for you.
- Don't bother correcting factual errors by sysops. They'll just block you and put them back.
- Never, EVER suggest that Liberals are anything other than Evil Incarnate.
By following these guidelines, you can spend many productive hours editing Conservapedia!
See also
- RationalWiki, an entire wiki originally founded to criticize Conservapedia and also to criticize pseudo-science in general.