Template talk:Size: Difference between revisions
(Do you like it raw?) |
(→Do you like it raw?: re) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
When providing a link to a wiki's statistics, is the raw count preferred, or the more user-friendly version? Obviously, it's up to the editor's discretion, but is there any advantage to providing the raw statistics without the accompanying explanations? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:16, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | When providing a link to a wiki's statistics, is the raw count preferred, or the more user-friendly version? Obviously, it's up to the editor's discretion, but is there any advantage to providing the raw statistics without the accompanying explanations? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:16, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
: Raw is good for MediaWikis in rarely spoken languages i.e. Chinese, because raw is in "SimpleEnglish". --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:25, 21 December 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:25, 21 December 2008
To help, see Project Wikis By Size
See also: Category:Wiki Size.
formatting
I just reverted an anon change to put this table on the right. Maybe that's appropriate, if it's right underneath our main wiki template, but the way I'm visioning this right now, it'll be at the very bottom of the page, and centered. Of course this can change. Please discuss when changing again. Thanks! TedErnst
- All comments on formatting welcome, including placement on the page. Should it be right-justified under the Wiki template? or centered like now? TedErnst | talk 19:28, 10 Mar 2006 (EST)
Since it overlaps the main template box on small screens when centered, I moved it to the left today. TedErnst | talk 17:23, 13 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Why not use the same formatting as template:wiki, with the size template designed to go below the wiki template on the right side of the page? User:BlankVerse | talk 23:09, 29 Mar 2006 (EST)
User:Smiddle/sizeTest
Could some skilled person please apply this template somehow into this? I tried but it didn't work. – Smiddle/TC@ 15:46, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
Do you like it raw?
When providing a link to a wiki's statistics, is the raw count preferred, or the more user-friendly version? Obviously, it's up to the editor's discretion, but is there any advantage to providing the raw statistics without the accompanying explanations? --MarvelZuvembie 16:16, 6 October 2008 (EDT)