Talk:Speckyfoureyes.com: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[AntiSpamMeasures#Spamming the spammers.|This is]] the point. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 06:20, 12 March 2009 (EDT) | [[AntiSpamMeasures#Spamming the spammers.|This is]] the point. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 06:20, 12 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Lol, now I get it :) But I think your message isn't explicit enough: I find it rather confusing, and if I hadn't noticed that a sysop did this edit, I'd have thought the page had been vandalized by a nonsense spammer. I think you should make it more clear, like "This website uses spam to promote themselves" or something. Also, what if someone spams the link to a concurrent website in order to make you give them a bad reputation? [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 13:14, 12 March 2009 (EDT) | :Lol, now I get it :) But I think your message isn't explicit enough: I find it rather confusing, and if I hadn't noticed that a sysop did this edit, I'd have thought the page had been vandalized by a nonsense spammer. I think you should make it more clear, like "This website uses spam to promote themselves" or something. Also, what if someone spams the link to a concurrent website in order to make you give them a bad reputation? [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 13:14, 12 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
I just attack all spammers. I don't attack specific firms. Not all spammers get the message so anyone trying to get me to do a competitor could help that competitor if I or another admin just deletes that without putting the message on. Then the competitor has benefited before the spam was deleted. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 15:18, 13 March 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 13 March 2009
I don't really get the point of this page, first the site in the title isn't a wiki at all, and second the page content is totally irrelevant to the title... Patheticcockroach 04:35, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
This is the point. Proxima Centauri 06:20, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
- Lol, now I get it :) But I think your message isn't explicit enough: I find it rather confusing, and if I hadn't noticed that a sysop did this edit, I'd have thought the page had been vandalized by a nonsense spammer. I think you should make it more clear, like "This website uses spam to promote themselves" or something. Also, what if someone spams the link to a concurrent website in order to make you give them a bad reputation? Patheticcockroach 13:14, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
I just attack all spammers. I don't attack specific firms. Not all spammers get the message so anyone trying to get me to do a competitor could help that competitor if I or another admin just deletes that without putting the message on. Then the competitor has benefited before the spam was deleted. Proxima Centauri 15:18, 13 March 2009 (EDT)